Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Fred's avatar

Both previous discussions with Balko and Collin were very informative, but I got nothing worthwhile out of this. To me, Ellison has no credibility in that he spoke like a close-minded, at times defensive, bulldozer politician. "Anyone who says it didn't happen is deliberately uttering falsehoods for the purpose of disinforming the public," which is like saying, "I'm right and you're wrong." There's nothing informative about that statement except as a signal to me to not waste my time listening.

Expand full comment
J Hull's avatar

There are several points in Ellisons discourse that are less than accurate/honest, but

<<I don't know one Democratic politician who ran on the banner of defund the police. >>

Seriously? A quick google search is all you need to prove willful ignorance on that one, and it isn't like the politician in question wasn't close to home. For example:

https://twitter.com/IlhanMN/status/1270148561536274439?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

Further, when John fairly challenged him the responses were "I don't believe that" with no contravening facts offered. Is that the legal version of sticking your fingers in your ears and going "lalalala I can't hear youuuu"?

Lastly, the idea that drawing from a more rural jury pool somehow mitigated the effects of holding the trial in the shadow of a city that incurred losses in the 100's of millions made the trial fair is absurd.

Expand full comment
52 more comments...

No posts