So what can we do? The discussion is going to be had regardless of whether the discussion will be sufficiently informed or not, so perhaps the best way forward is tolerate the "empty suit(s)" (difficult as that is) and to refute them via these comments which are in a way part of the podcast's discussion. Just like one can't understand Shakespeare without the margin comments, one can't fully appreciate the Glenn Show with the subscriber comments.
Or just do the next podcast on Gaza live from Gaza and let observations speak for themselves.
You're correct on all counts.
So what can we do? The discussion is going to be had regardless of whether the discussion will be sufficiently informed or not, so perhaps the best way forward is tolerate the "empty suit(s)" (difficult as that is) and to refute them via these comments which are in a way part of the podcast's discussion. Just like one can't understand Shakespeare without the margin comments, one can't fully appreciate the Glenn Show with the subscriber comments.
Or just do the next podcast on Gaza live from Gaza and let observations speak for themselves.