>Interesting. You show a lot more feeling for a fetus than you do for the mother who has to raise it.<
Feeling bad for someone doesn't give them an excuse to murder their own offspring.
>Look, I'm not poor and I can tell you aren't either...but can't you see how this is about more than a child's 'right' to life? How it's also about having a tolerable life?<
Why don't you go and ask all those poor souls subsisting on McDonald's if they'd rather that they were never born, and instead cut apart in the womb by surgical instruments? If any of them answer yes, you should inform them that since we have a Second Amendment in this country, if their life is truly nothing but intolerable suffering, there is a guaranteed pain-free way out that they can access quite easily. See how many of them end up deciding to take that option.
Then understand that is the choice you are saying that we should make for them, ahead of time, before they ever have any agency of their own.
Enough with your faux concern for the poor, P.O. You're not here for an honest conversation, you're hoping to start an ideological food fight. You're not going to get it. Not here.
Life is hell as an abused kid no matter *who* your parents are. I'm killfiling any future comments from you in my email because I'm done with you.
>You're not here for an honest conversation, you're hoping to start an ideological food fight.<
Yes, it is my intention to promote my understanding of the idea and to ridicule yours, because yours is both wrong and evil, and is thus worthy of both derision and rebuttal. Should those billionaire twins have been murdered in the crib to spare them their ordeal? And who would even be entrusted with such a choice if not for the already-abusive parents themselves? It's hard to imagine that billionaires lacked access to abortion, if they wanted to go that route in order to avoid having children.
>Interesting. You show a lot more feeling for a fetus than you do for the mother who has to raise it.<
Feeling bad for someone doesn't give them an excuse to murder their own offspring.
>Look, I'm not poor and I can tell you aren't either...but can't you see how this is about more than a child's 'right' to life? How it's also about having a tolerable life?<
Why don't you go and ask all those poor souls subsisting on McDonald's if they'd rather that they were never born, and instead cut apart in the womb by surgical instruments? If any of them answer yes, you should inform them that since we have a Second Amendment in this country, if their life is truly nothing but intolerable suffering, there is a guaranteed pain-free way out that they can access quite easily. See how many of them end up deciding to take that option.
Then understand that is the choice you are saying that we should make for them, ahead of time, before they ever have any agency of their own.
Enough with your faux concern for the poor, P.O. You're not here for an honest conversation, you're hoping to start an ideological food fight. You're not going to get it. Not here.
Life is hell as an abused kid no matter *who* your parents are. I'm killfiling any future comments from you in my email because I'm done with you.
https://abcnews.go.com/Health/billionaire-twins-abused-slaves-doris-duke-heir-father/story?id=19853671
>You're not here for an honest conversation, you're hoping to start an ideological food fight.<
Yes, it is my intention to promote my understanding of the idea and to ridicule yours, because yours is both wrong and evil, and is thus worthy of both derision and rebuttal. Should those billionaire twins have been murdered in the crib to spare them their ordeal? And who would even be entrusted with such a choice if not for the already-abusive parents themselves? It's hard to imagine that billionaires lacked access to abortion, if they wanted to go that route in order to avoid having children.