At a theoretical level, I think that is true. In practice, those pushing for "increased security" tend to do so in ways that make it more difficult for to vote legally.
If someone truly believed in, say, voter ID, but was not interested in using voter ID as a way to disenfrashcise certain types of voters, their voter ID proposal would not look the same as someone who was actually trying to disenfranchise. (Stacy Abrams, very much known as a voting rights advocate, is on record as supporting voter ID in concept).
At a theoretical level, I think that is true. In practice, those pushing for "increased security" tend to do so in ways that make it more difficult for to vote legally.
If someone truly believed in, say, voter ID, but was not interested in using voter ID as a way to disenfrashcise certain types of voters, their voter ID proposal would not look the same as someone who was actually trying to disenfranchise. (Stacy Abrams, very much known as a voting rights advocate, is on record as supporting voter ID in concept).