Take a deep breath. Crow can collect whatever he wants. Crow has a relationship with Thomas so the collection becomes important. Obama had a relationship with Rev. Wright, so the sermons became important.
If it is the responsibility of the donor to report, Crow is refusing to provide a list to the Senate.
(Deep breath being taken...) Reverend Wright's sermons (some of which I've read) are an excellent analogy with Crow's collecting nazi memorabilia, if indeed Crow does. While most Americans found Wright's sermons distasteful or worse, it did not destroy Obama's legacy, and the same should be true of Thomas. Whatever is between Crow and the Senate (or the law) is their business and does not reflect on Thomas, any more than Obama's association with terrorist Bill Ayers and Rod Blagojevich reflect directly on the reputation of President Obama.
Take a deep breath. Crow can collect whatever he wants. Crow has a relationship with Thomas so the collection becomes important. Obama had a relationship with Rev. Wright, so the sermons became important.
If it is the responsibility of the donor to report, Crow is refusing to provide a list to the Senate.
Are you really serious about this?
(Deep breath being taken...) Reverend Wright's sermons (some of which I've read) are an excellent analogy with Crow's collecting nazi memorabilia, if indeed Crow does. While most Americans found Wright's sermons distasteful or worse, it did not destroy Obama's legacy, and the same should be true of Thomas. Whatever is between Crow and the Senate (or the law) is their business and does not reflect on Thomas, any more than Obama's association with terrorist Bill Ayers and Rod Blagojevich reflect directly on the reputation of President Obama.
Obama gave a speech addressing Reverend Wright’s sermon.
He has multiple schools named in his honor