Kennedy is perplexing. In this debate and the past debate he relies very heavily on the usual moral civil rights rhetoric that is hard to argue with but doesn't really apply to the specifics of the debate or today's America. He is clinging to his vested and deeply held beliefs but sees that many aspects of his precious movements are absurd and indefensible.
If the left would admit that disparities are more attributable to behavior, competence, and performance rather than discrimination we could become so much more productive as a country.
Kennedy is perplexing. In this debate and the past debate he relies very heavily on the usual moral civil rights rhetoric that is hard to argue with but doesn't really apply to the specifics of the debate or today's America. He is clinging to his vested and deeply held beliefs but sees that many aspects of his precious movements are absurd and indefensible.
If the left would admit that disparities are more attributable to behavior, competence, and performance rather than discrimination we could become so much more productive as a country.