Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ian P's avatar

When we allow others to decide what information is allowed to be propagated, we don't learn the lessons of Nanjing or My Lai. We don't discover root causes and develop effective perspectives or solutions. It is a voluntary mental handicap to accept limitations on what can be known.

Expand full comment
Current Affairs's avatar

"You cannot understand the public debate about race and intelligence if you don’t read The Bell Curve. Attempts to make Murray persona non grata, to paint him as a racist and a hollow ideologue, simply don’t hold water. Attempts to deplatform him and hound him out of the public sphere are even worse."

One of these three points is not like the others. The first point—The Bell Curve should be read—is right. It is consequential so it should be read, just as the writings of John C. Calhoun should be read. The third point, deplatforming is bad, also true. But the second point, that "attempts to paint him as a racist and a hollow ideologue simply don't hold water" dismisses the SUBSTANCE of the critics' case against Murray without actually engaging our arguments. Why do the criticisms not hold water? I wrote a careful essay explaining why I believe it is accurate to call Murray racist: https://www.currentaffairs.org/2017/07/why-is-charles-murray-odious

Murray saw it, did not respond to the arguments, and just commented "I guess I'm odious." I object to the way that defenses of Murray's right to be heard and to have his arguments evaluated often turn into a substantive defense of his ideas as being valuable and his scholarship as being good. The fact that he shouldn't have been chased out of Middlebury College does not mean that he is not a racist or that the Bell Curve is not a shoddy piece of work. Harris says "I don't think he's a racist." But he seems unfamiliar with the arguments critics make to show Murray is racist. (I have also extensively critiqued Harris' shoddy reasoning, including his failure to grasp the critiques of Murray's work and challenge Murray on them. Harris didn't respond either. https://www.currentaffairs.org/2018/10/being-mr-reasonable )

Expand full comment
60 more comments...

No posts