On the error by Brown-Jackson vs Roberts (which I was not aware of until now) I think there is a clear difference. Roberts conclusion made sense based on the data he was given. The data may have been wrong, but the conclusion was logical and sound, given the data. Brown-Jacksons conclusion was very obviously wrong based on the data she was given. She made an error in logic or at least accepted and repeated a conclusion that was not backed up by the data she had right in front of her. I do not agree with those insinuating her error is a sign of low intelligence. I do believe she fell into the same trap most people do when they are emotionally attached to one side of a debate. When a conclusion supports your side you accept it uncritically and when a conclusion is in opposition to your side you scrutinize it. I think she missed the obvious flaw in this conclusion because she wanted it to be right.
On the error by Brown-Jackson vs Roberts (which I was not aware of until now) I think there is a clear difference. Roberts conclusion made sense based on the data he was given. The data may have been wrong, but the conclusion was logical and sound, given the data. Brown-Jacksons conclusion was very obviously wrong based on the data she was given. She made an error in logic or at least accepted and repeated a conclusion that was not backed up by the data she had right in front of her. I do not agree with those insinuating her error is a sign of low intelligence. I do believe she fell into the same trap most people do when they are emotionally attached to one side of a debate. When a conclusion supports your side you accept it uncritically and when a conclusion is in opposition to your side you scrutinize it. I think she missed the obvious flaw in this conclusion because she wanted it to be right.
Yes. The both data sets were wrong.