Every comment about another person with whom John disagrees politically (usually more famous and successful than he) seems to be an evidence-free assumption about the contents of that person's heart.
Clarence Thomas is gossiping about the evils of the Left when he shares a private humorous moment with his wife; JD Vance is a racist and dishonest sell-out, not a conduit for the corroborated complaints of his own constituents or a successful author and tech entrepreneur.
Donald Trump is a gorilla who John wishes would be removed from the public stage by gunfire.
John, how can you, when your own motives for saying what you believe have been impugned and maligned by others, have so little grace for your fellow men?
Every comment about another person with whom John disagrees politically (usually more famous and successful than he) seems to be an evidence-free assumption about the contents of that person's heart.
Clarence Thomas is gossiping about the evils of the Left when he shares a private humorous moment with his wife; JD Vance is a racist and dishonest sell-out, not a conduit for the corroborated complaints of his own constituents or a successful author and tech entrepreneur.
Donald Trump is a gorilla who John wishes would be removed from the public stage by gunfire.
John, how can you, when your own motives for saying what you believe have been impugned and maligned by others, have so little grace for your fellow men?