In reality, unions are unrelated/unnecessary to the function you're describing- to pick a minor example, the civil servants who work for the legislative and executive branches of the State of Texas are not unionized, but they cannot be fired by the governor, members of the legislature, or other political appointees. That's plain statutory language and construction, not the result of unions.
We need to remove one of the two; public sector unions or civil service protections. I vote to remove the former. It’s bad to have elected officials beholden to government employees.
In reality, unions are unrelated/unnecessary to the function you're describing- to pick a minor example, the civil servants who work for the legislative and executive branches of the State of Texas are not unionized, but they cannot be fired by the governor, members of the legislature, or other political appointees. That's plain statutory language and construction, not the result of unions.
We need to remove one of the two; public sector unions or civil service protections. I vote to remove the former. It’s bad to have elected officials beholden to government employees.