"My suspicion unfortunately is that she probably does or would sympathize with the Kendians and like our new recent Supreme Court justice, has no qualms about lying about it. I mean it’s theoretically possible for her to have no knowledge of CRT or DEI before being offered the position, but why the hell would she take a position for DEI without educating *herself* about it. "
Have you read the pro-publica piece? There's a lot of conjecture in your comment, and a quick scan of the article will convince you that Cecilia was wronged. I trust Pro-Publica because their journalism is solid (actual journalism and not the kind you see on Substack or some blog).
Yes. I have read the pro public. The “article” I was referring to was the pro-publica piece. Given they failed to report a detailed expression of her own views on the claims of Kendian pseudo anti-racists when that was what the parents were angry about, I’d say their journalism was actually garbage. Arguably propaganda.
And are you saying Glenn Greenwald’s journalism isn’t solid?
If you read my correction to myself... you will also discover a quote from an interview she has where she denies CRT is being taught in classrooms.
Given that the teachers union that is the largest union in the country encourages teaching “crt” in k-12, her statement is either egregious ignorance or deception. Either way, her unwillingness to confront angry “diverse” parents and inform them of her views on “diversity” is enough evidence for me that she didn’t deserve the job. Maybe she will mature.
And we are now in a situation where it is reasonable to infer that anyone who accepts a DEI position is a Kendian until proven otherwise. Can you show me any DEI program using the words “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” that explicitly rejects the Kendian view of “equity” or his degenerate definition of racism? That would be very refreshing.
"My suspicion unfortunately is that she probably does or would sympathize with the Kendians and like our new recent Supreme Court justice, has no qualms about lying about it. I mean it’s theoretically possible for her to have no knowledge of CRT or DEI before being offered the position, but why the hell would she take a position for DEI without educating *herself* about it. "
Have you read the pro-publica piece? There's a lot of conjecture in your comment, and a quick scan of the article will convince you that Cecilia was wronged. I trust Pro-Publica because their journalism is solid (actual journalism and not the kind you see on Substack or some blog).
Yes. I have read the pro public. The “article” I was referring to was the pro-publica piece. Given they failed to report a detailed expression of her own views on the claims of Kendian pseudo anti-racists when that was what the parents were angry about, I’d say their journalism was actually garbage. Arguably propaganda.
And are you saying Glenn Greenwald’s journalism isn’t solid?
If you read my correction to myself... you will also discover a quote from an interview she has where she denies CRT is being taught in classrooms.
https://www.thirteen.org/programs/frontline/cecelia-lewis-critical-race-theory-doesnt-exist-in-k-12-kib7/
Given that the teachers union that is the largest union in the country encourages teaching “crt” in k-12, her statement is either egregious ignorance or deception. Either way, her unwillingness to confront angry “diverse” parents and inform them of her views on “diversity” is enough evidence for me that she didn’t deserve the job. Maybe she will mature.
And we are now in a situation where it is reasonable to infer that anyone who accepts a DEI position is a Kendian until proven otherwise. Can you show me any DEI program using the words “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” that explicitly rejects the Kendian view of “equity” or his degenerate definition of racism? That would be very refreshing.