If you want me to acknowledge you are right and I am wrong I am fine with that since you may know a lot more about these things than I do. Additionally, I am not looking for an argument. The main thrust of my assertion in the beginning, which is only an opinion, is that the USA is liable to go more into socialist solutions than capitalist ones given the current situation and the future challenges. I certainly do not know why the authors of that article made the decisions/assertions they made in writing the article. If you want to argue their points then do contact them. I just liked how they parsed the terms socialism and communism.
I use "socialism" to mean what the article you linked to says in its first sentence: production and wealth are collectively owned. I'm still trying to understand what you mean by "socialism," since that doesn't describe Scandinavian countries AFAICT.
If you want me to acknowledge you are right and I am wrong I am fine with that since you may know a lot more about these things than I do. Additionally, I am not looking for an argument. The main thrust of my assertion in the beginning, which is only an opinion, is that the USA is liable to go more into socialist solutions than capitalist ones given the current situation and the future challenges. I certainly do not know why the authors of that article made the decisions/assertions they made in writing the article. If you want to argue their points then do contact them. I just liked how they parsed the terms socialism and communism.
I use "socialism" to mean what the article you linked to says in its first sentence: production and wealth are collectively owned. I'm still trying to understand what you mean by "socialism," since that doesn't describe Scandinavian countries AFAICT.
Good Bye Jonathan.
That's disappointing. I thought there was potential for an interesting conversation.