Not sure it's worth my time replying but here goes.
Who said I agreed with either of the two groups you mentioned, of which I personally know nothing about? It's possible I could agree with them, but that would be beside the point. School choice seems to be a viable and reasonable solution to this problem you have with these (bullying) groups you disagree with. It allows the family the opportunity to educate their children in an environment and within a curriculum that best suits their child's needs and values.
How is the current "Uni-mind" system any different than the "Uni-mind" system the conservative groups are advocating for? Different curriculum but same forced curriculum results. Why, under the present, one option fits all approach, is there no room for discussion and discourse about what curriculum is appropriate and most relevant to our children achievhing their highest potential? We should just accept what someone finds to be the most redeemable and righteous curriculum because they say we should and just accept that? You're not buying that from the conservative groups and I'm not buying that from you either.
There absolutely was snark in my initial response in conflating the two sides of the school choice debate. I believe my rebuttal made clear why I believe it to be an important alternative to the current approach to education and if the opposition to school choice will not concede to the idea they damn well should be open to discourse about what curriculum we're teaching our children.
Not sure it's worth my time replying but here goes.
Who said I agreed with either of the two groups you mentioned, of which I personally know nothing about? It's possible I could agree with them, but that would be beside the point. School choice seems to be a viable and reasonable solution to this problem you have with these (bullying) groups you disagree with. It allows the family the opportunity to educate their children in an environment and within a curriculum that best suits their child's needs and values.
How is the current "Uni-mind" system any different than the "Uni-mind" system the conservative groups are advocating for? Different curriculum but same forced curriculum results. Why, under the present, one option fits all approach, is there no room for discussion and discourse about what curriculum is appropriate and most relevant to our children achievhing their highest potential? We should just accept what someone finds to be the most redeemable and righteous curriculum because they say we should and just accept that? You're not buying that from the conservative groups and I'm not buying that from you either.
You seem stuck on a double standard here.
You said Conservatives supported forced attendance at public schools. Conservatives are well known for supporting charter schools.
Liberals are not known for supporting school choice.
I interpreted your post as snark, thus the response.
Edited corrected
forced attendance rather than force attendance
There absolutely was snark in my initial response in conflating the two sides of the school choice debate. I believe my rebuttal made clear why I believe it to be an important alternative to the current approach to education and if the opposition to school choice will not concede to the idea they damn well should be open to discourse about what curriculum we're teaching our children.
Your intent was not clear to me.
Multiple school districts have or are having discussions about charter schools
One major question in many districts centers around if results are better with charter schools.