There absolutely was snark in my initial response in conflating the two sides of the school choice debate. I believe my rebuttal made clear why I believe it to be an important alternative to the current approach to education and if the opposition to school choice will not concede to the idea they damn well should be open to discourse about what curriculum we're teaching our children.
You said Conservatives supported forced attendance at public schools. Conservatives are well known for supporting charter schools.
Liberals are not known for supporting school choice.
I interpreted your post as snark, thus the response.
Edited corrected
forced attendance rather than force attendance
There absolutely was snark in my initial response in conflating the two sides of the school choice debate. I believe my rebuttal made clear why I believe it to be an important alternative to the current approach to education and if the opposition to school choice will not concede to the idea they damn well should be open to discourse about what curriculum we're teaching our children.
Your intent was not clear to me.
Multiple school districts have or are having discussions about charter schools
One major question in many districts centers around if results are better with charter schools.