I haven't seen any open discussion here about January 6 committee, which is the predicate you want to use for Trump's disqualification. Why put the cart before the horse? Or, if you want to get another dissenting opinion, why not interview Mollie Hemingway who wrote "Rigged" that describes Democrat "fortification" of 2020—the underlying cause of J6. She has plenty of footnotes. Five years of mind-numbing BS about Russia Collusion ought to dispose any thinking person to be skeptical of any Democrat lawfare, but no, we still have the convenient, absurd and disingenuous claims that Trump legally qualifies under the 14th amendment despite the fact that he has not been convicted of "insurrection" or even charged. How can it be responsible to discuss removing, by these obviously quasi-legal means, a candidate who has the support of at least 70 million voters. How can you claim to support democracy?
Glen and John should give some thought to how often they book guests that are far to the left of their own opinions, and the opinions of their subscribers. Especially when all you throw at the guests are softballs. Leftist "mainstream" opinions don't really need any extra help from you. Being caught in the fog of academia is some excuse, but your backwardness, or unwillingness to consider widely accepted and documented alternative opinions (for example J6, 2020, etc) is maddening and not responsible. There is a ton of information out there, and reliable reporters (Glen Greenwald, Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist, Matt Taibbi, Julie Kelly and others) why not take some care to put some balance in your interviews?
Seems to me that Glenn politely but completely exposed Kaiser here by demanding specifics that Kaiser couldn't provide - not sure what video you watched. Sometimes it's best to let someone dig his own grave...
I haven't seen any open discussion here about January 6 committee, which is the predicate you want to use for Trump's disqualification. Why put the cart before the horse? Or, if you want to get another dissenting opinion, why not interview Mollie Hemingway who wrote "Rigged" that describes Democrat "fortification" of 2020—the underlying cause of J6. She has plenty of footnotes. Five years of mind-numbing BS about Russia Collusion ought to dispose any thinking person to be skeptical of any Democrat lawfare, but no, we still have the convenient, absurd and disingenuous claims that Trump legally qualifies under the 14th amendment despite the fact that he has not been convicted of "insurrection" or even charged. How can it be responsible to discuss removing, by these obviously quasi-legal means, a candidate who has the support of at least 70 million voters. How can you claim to support democracy?
Glen and John should give some thought to how often they book guests that are far to the left of their own opinions, and the opinions of their subscribers. Especially when all you throw at the guests are softballs. Leftist "mainstream" opinions don't really need any extra help from you. Being caught in the fog of academia is some excuse, but your backwardness, or unwillingness to consider widely accepted and documented alternative opinions (for example J6, 2020, etc) is maddening and not responsible. There is a ton of information out there, and reliable reporters (Glen Greenwald, Mollie Hemingway of The Federalist, Matt Taibbi, Julie Kelly and others) why not take some care to put some balance in your interviews?
Seems to me that Glenn politely but completely exposed Kaiser here by demanding specifics that Kaiser couldn't provide - not sure what video you watched. Sometimes it's best to let someone dig his own grave...