Always mistakes. The idea I started with is that there are multiple *kinds* of intelligence. IQ measures a certain kind-a intelligence that, in these times, is highly remunerative. That could change. Especially 10 or 15 years out when AI pseudo-intelligence exceeds IQ.
The other point I would make is that, to my knowledge (which isn't perfect), there is one common-denominator amongst people who reach the highest levels of attainment that is often overlooked. And that's humility which can lead to awe and joy.
And money isn't always the best measure of attainment, right?
Almost forgot to mention that there is often an *inverse* relationship between IQ and life-skills, right?
Always mistakes. The idea I started with is that there are multiple *kinds* of intelligence. IQ measures a certain kind-a intelligence that, in these times, is highly remunerative. That could change. Especially 10 or 15 years out when AI pseudo-intelligence exceeds IQ.
The other point I would make is that, to my knowledge (which isn't perfect), there is one common-denominator amongst people who reach the highest levels of attainment that is often overlooked. And that's humility which can lead to awe and joy.
And money isn't always the best measure of attainment, right?
Almost forgot to mention that there is often an *inverse* relationship between IQ and life-skills, right?