I thought it was a great conversation, and I’d love to see society get back to being able to disagree respectfully and still like each other as people.
My only complaint was there were too many placeholders like one of you two intellectual giants mention an author and that immediately meant a whole line of argumentation was understood by the other, like a shorthand, but it left me out in the cold at times because I haven’t read these books you mentioned.
I’d love to have heard you get more into the weeds on the details, and it would have been nice to hear you ask questions about the mass murder.
One good thing, since listening I have found myself watching a lot of his content on YouTube. He’s an excellent debater, but I just can’t get on board with his ideas.
I thought it was a great conversation, and I’d love to see society get back to being able to disagree respectfully and still like each other as people.
My only complaint was there were too many placeholders like one of you two intellectual giants mention an author and that immediately meant a whole line of argumentation was understood by the other, like a shorthand, but it left me out in the cold at times because I haven’t read these books you mentioned.
I’d love to have heard you get more into the weeds on the details, and it would have been nice to hear you ask questions about the mass murder.
One good thing, since listening I have found myself watching a lot of his content on YouTube. He’s an excellent debater, but I just can’t get on board with his ideas.
I applaud you for having him on!