Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Sea Sentry's avatar

I can see Judge Cahill excluding George Floyd's long criminal history from the trial - what matters is the case at hand.

But how could the judge justify excluding police body camera footage, especially if it provided context if not exoneration?

How could the judge have banned mention of the MPD Training Manual that explicitly shows that the restraint Chauvin used was taught as a standard technique? In fact, why hasn't former MPD Police Chief Arradondo been sued for perjury, saying under oath that the technique wasn't police procedure when it was clearly taught as such?

And on what basis did the judge decide to exclude information about the 911 call screwup, which had nothing to do with the police and which delayed the medical response time to 20 minutes even though a fire station was only 7-8 blocks away?

My last question: denied good schools by the teachers unions, and denied safe neighborhoods by the liberal and mostly white "defund the police" protestors, when is the urban African American community going to realize they are being played, over and over again?

Expand full comment
mhj's avatar

Almost everything was known before the trials of Chauvin and the other officers.

This was a concerted and well-funded effort to radically transform America and its institutions, and it succeeded.

You may remember the "Central Park Karen" case a day or two before. The media and NGOs were revving up to use that to undermine society, when the George Floyd case broke, a much better case for them as it involved death of a black person, police, and plenty of video footage. The ensuing days saw riots all over the western world, $1-2 billion in property damage, and almost every institution in the US caving in to demands for setting up and staffing racist bureaucracies and funding racist programs.

It has been noted, but by very few, that in the trials of Chauvin and the other police, no prosecutor ever alleged any racial motive or animus--and had there been any such evidence at all, you know it would have been the centerpiece of their case.

When Trump first called the media "enemy of the people" I though it typical Trumpian exaggeration and wished he hadn't gone there. After the Floyd case, I realized he was understating it.

Expand full comment
95 more comments...

No posts