The debate rages on: Should Donald Trump’s eligibility for the presidency be left in the hands of the voters or the courts? Personally, I don’t think there’s any question about this, especially now that Trump is the sole remaining candidate for the Republican nomination. Republican voters are aware of the charges he’s facing, and they’ve opted to run him anyway. Disqualifying him from the ballot via the courts would infringe on the people’s right to elect their president. John, as you may know, disagrees. He believes a second Trump term would be so disastrous that it would be justified to disqualify him using legal but undemocratic methods. In this clip from our most recent subscriber-only session, we duke it out.1
This clip is taken from a subscriber-only Q&A session. For access to Q&As, comments, early episodes, and a host of other benefits, click below and subscribe.
The Supreme Court has decided, in Trump v. Anderson, that states cannot determine eligibility for a federal office. Nevertheless, with Trump still facing criminal charges, the courts remain an issue.
The willingness to undermine whatever integrity of our legal system remains to go after Trump on the premise that he's "evil" just goes to show you how crazed DemocRATS are. They don't care about the harm they'll do to trust in institutions; it's all about tying Trump's hands. Considering, as others have pointed out, we KNOW what 4 years of Trump was like vs. almost 4 really bad years of Biden, the doddering, wokeshevik authoritarian. That is why people are rejecting Biden and his "transgender," anti-religion, anti-parent, anti-American, policies, not to mention his absolutely disastrous meddling with the economy that was WAY better before he came along. Oh, and let's not forget the revelations of his career-long graft.
John should be ashamed of himself, but, he and his ilk won't be.
I love listening to John bash Trump .. he has no idea he is describing Obama.