Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Brian Huskie's avatar

Just the fact that you are wrestling with these necessary decisions, seemingly in good faith, puts you in the 99th percentile of editors, regardless of my opinion on the actual decisions.

Expand full comment
Montana Shadow's avatar

Welp, since YOU asked, Thomas....Your censorious, pearl clutching suggestion here that the word ‘degenerate’ to describe, by example, those heathen dirtbags who recently raided and looted the WaWa convenience store in Philly is beyond absurd! Couldn’t that ‘bad word’ be used to refer to ANY egregiously offending racial group appropriately? Do you actually think that the average reader sees that word in this context and thinks that it means anything other than debased, immoral and corrupt? You believe that the reader is actually assuming the original poster meant ‘lacking in original genes’? Gimme a f’n break! This aforementioned ‘policy’ of yours, in this regard, is embarrassing! What’s next, like that race-hustling charlatan Charles Blow at the NYT says, ‘We can’t use the word ‘thug’ cause it’s always a white supremacist euphemism and dog whistle for the ‘N’ word?!?!? Puhleeeeeeze! I dunno about the rest of the ‘evil terms’ listed in your little censorship explanation mea culpa produced here, but forbidding ‘degenerate’ to describe these pathologically cursed type of individuals OF ANY RACE is both pathetic and sadly emblematic of what’s happening to shut down free speech in our country writ-large! FOR SHAME! And I hope Glenn reads this and reels you in on this gutless move to make sure people’s feelings aren’t hurt! Respectfully, grow a pair!

Expand full comment
380 more comments...

No posts